Measurement invariance of the moral vitalism scale across 28 cultural groups
View/ Open
Access
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDate
2020Author
Rudnev, MaksimVauclair, Christin-Melanie
AminihajibashiI, Samira
Becker, Maja
Bilewicz, Michal
Luis Castellanos Guevara, Jose
Collier-Baker, Emma
Crespo, Carla
Eastwic, Paul
Fischer, Ronald
Friese, Malte
Gomez, Angel
Guerra, Valeschka
Hanke, Katja
Hooper, Nic
Huang, Li-li
Karasawa, Minoru
Kuppens, Peter
Loughnan, Steve
Peker, Müjde
Pelay, Cesar
Pina, Afroditi
Sachkova, Marianna
Saguy, Tamar
Shi, Junqi
Silfver-Kuhalampi, Mia
Sortheix, Florencia
Swann, William
Tong, Jennifer (Yuk-Yue)
Wailan Yeung, Victoria
Bastian, Brock
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Rudnev, M., Vauclair, C.-M., Aminihajibashi, S., Becker, M., Bilewicz, M., Castellanos, G. J. L., Collier-Baker, E., ... Wisneski, D. (June 09, 2020). Measurement invariance of the moral vitalism scale across 28 cultural groups. Plos One, 15, 6. p. 1-11) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233989Abstract
Moral vitalism refers to a tendency to view good and evil as actual forces that can influence people and events. The Moral Vitalism Scale had been designed to assess moral vitalism in a brief survey form. Previous studies established the reliability and validity of the scale in US-American and Australian samples. In this study, the cross-cultural comparability of the scale was tested across 28 different cultural groups worldwide through measurement invariance tests. A series of exact invariance tests marginally supported partial metric invariance, however, an approximate invariance approach provided evidence of partial scalar invariance for a 5-item measure. The established level of measurement invariance allows for comparisons of latent means across cultures. We conclude that the brief measure of moral vitalism is invariant across 28 cultures and can be used to estimate levels of moral vitalism with the same precision across very different cultural settings.